<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apostrophic flow chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/</link>
	<description>Where being boring kills (cf Acts 20)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:02:11 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goannatree</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-17646</link>
		<dc:creator>Goannatree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=7026#comment-17646</guid>
		<description>Nathan, where did you get this from originally? I can&#039;t find the attribution link and i&#039;d like to look at some of their other stuff. thanks.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, where did you get this from originally? I can&#039;t find the attribution link and i&#039;d like to look at some of their other stuff. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Eutychus &#187; On for young and old</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-17476</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Eutychus &#187; On for young and old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=7026#comment-17476</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m friends with some of her friends on Facebook. And they&#8217;re all like &#8220;OMG, OMG!!! I&#8217;d totally die without my phone? I totes* need to update my Facebook Status with every meaningless thought&#8221; and &#8220;where&#8217;s my pancakes?&#8221;&#8230; though that&#8217;s sans punctuation including apostrophes. Because they don&#8217;t know how to use them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m friends with some of her friends on Facebook. And they&#8217;re all like &#8220;OMG, OMG!!! I&#8217;d totally die without my phone? I totes* need to update my Facebook Status with every meaningless thought&#8221; and &#8220;where&#8217;s my pancakes?&#8221;&#8230; though that&#8217;s sans punctuation including apostrophes. Because they don&#8217;t know how to use them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-17357</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=7026#comment-17357</guid>
		<description>I would think they are talking about 1990 - because Hammer pants weren&#039;t around for that much longer... 
 
Also, the apostrophe after the s rule is not actually a hard and fast rule. It could be 90s&#039;s and still be correct.  
 
Gordon,  
 
There are a few more bits to the flow chart if you follow the link... but I would point out that for consistent use of the apostrophe in DVDs it should be D&#039;V&#039;D&#039;s. And that&#039;s not pretty, nor does it fit with any rules for acronymising words... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think they are talking about 1990 &#8211; because Hammer pants weren&#039;t around for that much longer&#8230; </p>
<p>Also, the apostrophe after the s rule is not actually a hard and fast rule. It could be 90s&#039;s and still be correct.  </p>
<p>Gordon,  </p>
<p>There are a few more bits to the flow chart if you follow the link&#8230; but I would point out that for consistent use of the apostrophe in DVDs it should be D&#039;V&#039;D&#039;s. And that&#039;s not pretty, nor does it fit with any rules for acronymising words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-17356</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=7026#comment-17356</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an error on that flow chart. 
 
It should be &quot;90s&#039; fashion&quot; not &quot;90&#039;s fashion&quot; UNLESS you are talking about the specific year 1990, rather than the entire decade. But it&#039;s probably in reference to the decade, in which case it&#039;s denoting a plural -hence &quot;90s&quot;- and then a possessive of that plural, hence &quot;90s&#039; &quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s an error on that flow chart. </p>
<p>It should be &quot;90s&#039; fashion&quot; not &quot;90&#039;s fashion&quot; UNLESS you are talking about the specific year 1990, rather than the entire decade. But it&#039;s probably in reference to the decade, in which case it&#039;s denoting a plural -hence &quot;90s&quot;- and then a possessive of that plural, hence &quot;90s&#039; &quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queenstuss</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-17352</link>
		<dc:creator>queenstuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=7026#comment-17352</guid>
		<description>The English language is far too stressful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English language is far too stressful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Cheng</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/apostrophic-flow-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-17349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Cheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=7026#comment-17349</guid>
		<description>But the rule &quot;Is it indicating possession? Use an apostrophe&quot; is not sufficiently qualified in this chart. 
 
So following that rule, I would right &quot;hi&#039;s apostrophic flow chart didn&#039;t contain enough qualifications to make it&#039;s meaning accurate or clear.&quot; 
 
Also, I quite like signs advertising &quot;CD&#039;s and DVD&#039;s&quot; because they remind me that the letters &#039;isc&#039; have been omitted. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the rule &quot;Is it indicating possession? Use an apostrophe&quot; is not sufficiently qualified in this chart. </p>
<p>So following that rule, I would right &quot;hi&#039;s apostrophic flow chart didn&#039;t contain enough qualifications to make it&#039;s meaning accurate or clear.&quot; </p>
<p>Also, I quite like signs advertising &quot;CD&#039;s and DVD&#039;s&quot; because they remind me that the letters &#039;isc&#039; have been omitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
