First off, the author creates a main character which is an empty shell. Her appearance isn’t described in detail; that way, any female can slip into it and easily fantasize about being this person. I read 400 pages of that book and barely had any idea of what the main character looked like; as far as I was concerned she was a giant Lego brick. Appearance aside, her personality is portrayed as insecure, fumbling, and awkward – a combination anyone who ever went through puberty can relate to. By creating this “empty shell,” the character becomes less of a person and more of something a female reader can put on and wear. Because I forgot her name (I think it was Barbara or Brando or something like that), I’m going to refer to her as “Pants” from here on out.
Nathan runs St Eutychus. He is currently a student at the Queensland Theological College. In a previous professional life he worked in public relations for an economic development and tourism marketing organisation. He is married to Robyn. He likes coffee and the internet.
Nathan has produced 3173 articles.
Check out my photos 
Or 
Watch my videos 
Here's my 
Follow me on 
Connect with me on
Be my friend on
Check out my 
nm(dot)campbell(at)
1Ben McLaughlin
wrote on 26 November 2009 at 21:31
heh!
'pants'!
'giant lego brick'!
2Amy
wrote on 27 November 2009 at 0:44
All the characters are empty shells (all ready to project your visions on to)…
3Leah
wrote on 27 November 2009 at 1:22
I always think, if you're going to criticise something, do it credibly. Bella's appearance is described pretty obviously.
Also, the idea that all the characters are empty shells is way off. That's pretty much the only reason I like the Twilight books – because I enjoy the Cullen characters (bar Edward). They're filled out pretty well, especially over New Moon and Eclipse.
4Amy
wrote on 27 November 2009 at 1:45
Alright, all the three main characters are empty shells.