<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New strategy for the new atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://st-eutychus.com/2009/new-strategy-for-the-new-atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/new-strategy-for-the-new-atheism/</link>
	<description>Where being boring kills (cf Acts 20)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:20:59 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/new-strategy-for-the-new-atheism/comment-page-1/#comment-15703</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=6120#comment-15703</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a fair charge to level at the church generally rather than specific individuals. 

I get the impression that he&#039;s suggesting the solution is not to water down the gospel but to actually live it. It&#039;s nothing new or profound - but it&#039;s a point that needs making over and over again. We can fight the intellectual fight all we like - but it&#039;s not generally an intellectual argument that wins converts to atheism. It&#039;s either the attractive lifestyle that not believing in God presents or the disconnect between what Christians say and what they do. 

The Friendly Atheist has &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/08/29/the-winning-strategy-for-atheists/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;linked to the iMonk story&lt;/a&gt; and basically suggested that appealing to believers on the basis of lifestyle is the way to deconvert them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a fair charge to level at the church generally rather than specific individuals. </p>
<p>I get the impression that he&#8217;s suggesting the solution is not to water down the gospel but to actually live it. It&#8217;s nothing new or profound &#8211; but it&#8217;s a point that needs making over and over again. We can fight the intellectual fight all we like &#8211; but it&#8217;s not generally an intellectual argument that wins converts to atheism. It&#8217;s either the attractive lifestyle that not believing in God presents or the disconnect between what Christians say and what they do. </p>
<p>The Friendly Atheist has <a href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/08/29/the-winning-strategy-for-atheists/" rel="nofollow">linked to the iMonk story</a> and basically suggested that appealing to believers on the basis of lifestyle is the way to deconvert them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kutz</title>
		<link>http://st-eutychus.com/2009/new-strategy-for-the-new-atheism/comment-page-1/#comment-15701</link>
		<dc:creator>Kutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://st-eutychus.com/?p=6120#comment-15701</guid>
		<description>The problem with this analysis is, who is the we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this analysis is, who is the we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
