On Twilight, feminism, and ethics

Back in July Amy gave quite a rea­son­able point of view on the dam­age Twi­light might do to young girls.

Here’s what she said…

I am really wor­ried about the world­view this presents to teenage girls (say 13 and 14 year olds). A lot of peo­ple in (US) Chris­t­ian cir­cles are jump­ing on Twi­light as being okay for their kids to read (unlike Harry Pot­ter – but you don’t want to get me started on how short­sighted that is) because they think it sup­ports absti­nence (which hon­estly, it really doesn’t – not hav­ing sex because you might kill some­one is a lot dif­fer­ent to choos­ing to for moral reasons).”

Almost as soon as Bella meets Edward, she decides to give up col­lege or any idea of a nor­mal life (includ­ing see­ing her fam­ily), so she can become undead like him. That’s right girls – find the right guy and just get him to look after you. You won’t ever have to think about look­ing after yourself.”

An opin­ion writer from the Her­ald has essen­tially regur­gi­tated the same point of view.

She cel­e­brates char­ac­ters from chick lit­er­a­ture of the past — like the girls from Lit­tle Women and Anne of Green Gables…

For more than a cen­tury, Jo March and Anne Shirley have been teach­ing lit­tle girls that there is more to life than hook­ing up with a rich, hand­some bloke. Now, in 2009, we have a hero­ine who tells them that it’s worth their fam­ily, their edu­ca­tion and their soul.

But in the same piece presents an inter­est­ing eth­i­cal dilemma as though it’s a fait accompli…

They con­ceive a half-vampire, half-human child. Baby vam­pires are par­tic­u­larly dan­ger­ous, appar­ently, as they have as lit­tle restraint as any baby and have been known to slaugh­ter entire cities when they’re hun­gry. But with cus­tom­ary thought­less­ness and con­fused moral­ity, Bella refuses to have an abor­tion. Her deci­sion puts a lot of peo­ple to a lot of trouble.”

Assum­ing, for a moment, that vam­pires are real… why is this refusal to have an abor­tion framed in such black and white terms? It would seem to be more com­plex than that…

  1. 1

    I feel so influ­en­tual right now.

    I think the abor­tion point was made because the mutant vampire/human hybrids were sup­pos­edly raven­ing beasts who would run ram­part and kill every­thing in their path. Includ­ing the mother.

    The baby did break Bella’s spine on the way out (amongst other gra­tu­itous vio­lent mayhem)…


  2. 2

    But the baby allowed Ms Meyer to intro­duce an even more dis­turb­ing pae­dophilic sto­ry­line which was just… great…

    There are some severely twisted morals in those books.


  3. 3

    That last quote about the baby is wrong.

    They did not know what a hybrid baby human/vampire would be like. It had never hap­pened in recorded vam­pire his­tory before. That’s why Edward was so ter­ri­fied when he dis­cov­ered Bella was pregnant.

    The bit about being par­tic­u­larly dan­ger­ous and slaugh­ter­ing entire cities refers to YOUNG vam­pires; that is, a per­son (no mat­ter their age) who has only recently been turned into a vam­pire. Every vam­pire goes through that stage, in about the first year of their vam­pire “life”, and it is up to the vam­pire who cre­ated them to con­trol them and teach them the “rules”. In Eclipse, for exam­ple, a vam­pire intent on revenge cre­ates an army of “new­borns” with no inten­tion of con­trol­ling them or teach­ing them the rules. They are the dan­ger­ous vam­pires, not hybrid babies.

    The Herald’s writer obvi­ously didn’t read Eclipse and Break­ing Dawn very closely. So really, the idea they should abort because the baby might have been insanely dan­ger­ous wasn’t even an issue. The only rea­son that abor­tion may have crossed their mind was because they noticed, as the preg­nancy pro­gressed, that it was hav­ing adverse health effects on Bella and could kill her. She refused to have an abor­tion just because the preg­nancy or birth might kill her. And that deci­sion is not for­eign to our world.

    And Amy, there was no pae­dophilic sto­ry­line. For it to be pae­dophilic, there has to be some­thing sex­ual going on, or some sex­ual attrac­tion. There wasn’t.

    I am split when it comes to the Twi­light series; I think in gen­eral the periph­eral sto­ry­lines are enter­tain­ing, and the periph­eral char­ac­ters are fun too. (And the not-so-peripheral char­ac­ters, like the Cullen fam­ily). But Edward, Bella, and the main romance sto­ry­line I find just lame. It’s stu­pid, it’s badly writ­ten, it’s pathetic, Bella’s a pushover and Edward is stu­pidly over-protective and I was annoyed when Edward returned at the end of New Moon. But Twilight’s had a lot of other crit­i­cisms lev­elled at it that I think are non-existent. The pae­doh­pilia crit­i­cism being one of them.

    When it comes to 13 and 14 year old girls, they shouldn’t be read­ing Break­ing Dawn any­way. I wouldn’t want my sis­ter to read it, and she’s almost 16.


  4. 4

    I also read that abor­tion com­ment and thought “What the?”.

    If you’re itch­ing for a fight Nathan now that the athi­ests have largely bug­gered off, you could head over to http://www.feministing.com/ that Saman­tha Britt links to in todays SMH blog…


  5. 5
    queenstuss

    I haven’t read any of the Twi­light books, or seen any of the films. I prob­a­bly won’t. I have bet­ter things to do with my time.
    I have bet­ter things to do with my time to watch movies , most of which tell me that all a girl needs to do to be happy is to hook up with a rich and hand­some bloke.


  6. 6

    The pae­dophilic sto­ry­line I was talk­ing about is the whole Jacob/Renesme plot­line, not Bella/Edward.

    I’m going to allow myself a lit­tle scope to not be absolutely spot on with events in the last novel because I’ve tried to sear the entire book from my mind.


  7. 7

    But yes, I’ll con­cede that it is prob­a­bly not quite the right term.
    So find a term that means the slightly dis­turb­ing idea that some­one can fall in love with a baby and know that they are their life part­ner with­out either hav­ing any choice in the matter.

    I’d agree totally with young teenage (or even older) girls read­ing this book. It’s all very enter­tain­ing (totally with­out lit­er­ary merit though) as long as you accept it as a fan­tasy. What’s dis­turb­ing is all these young girls (13, 14, 15 year-olds) who are run­ning around with shirts say­ing ‘I just want an Edward, is that too much to ask?’ and totally obsess­ing over a fic­tional char­ac­ter. How many bad choices are going to be made by these girls before they work out what a rela­tion­ship should be?


  8. 8

    I’d agree totally with young teenage (or even older) girls read­ing this book.
    Sorry, I mis­wrote this sen­tence. I agree with Leah that teenage girls prob­a­bly shouldn’t be read­ing this book. Unfor­tu­nately this is who it is being mar­keted at (along with 57000 oth­ers all the same).


  9. 9

    My main prob­lem with the series is about how it may delude teenage girls about what is accept­able behav­iour from their boyfriends. In New Moon Edward basi­cally tells Bella he doesn’t like her any­more and dumps her. Bella isn’t to know it’s really because he loves her and wants to pro­tect her etc. As far as she is con­cerned, she just got rejected. Big time. So she slumps into this mega depres­sion for months on end ignor­ing both her fam­ily and friends who she quite obvi­ously does not value as much as this sup­posed ‘love of her life’ who she only knew for a few months. Can’t you see all the deluded young girls ignor­ing their fam­ily and friends and say­ing ‘he’s really in love with me but…’ and mak­ing count­less excuses for their boyfriend’s bad behav­iour? The other dis­turb­ing thing is the domes­tic vio­lence sit­u­a­tion between Sam and Emily. Who cares if he only lost his tem­per ‘once’. Get out and get out NOW.


St. Eutychus does not believe in spam. Your email address will be kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account this field will be used to display your avatar. St. Eutychus will not sell your data to spammers or scammers. We promise.

Plug your blog. I know that's why you're commenting...

St. Eutychus does not believe in long winded comment policies or heavy handed moderation. So:
  • Keep it civil.
  • Keep it clean.
  • Play the ball, not the man.
  • Don't break any defamation laws.


Allowed tags: <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

Jeff K : I ask people how their Bible reading is going if I get into
Read more...

KIM : *like* or am i not supposed to put words in stars?? i li
Read more...

Ben McLaughlin : Heh! That's cool that they were such good sports about it.
Read more...

Al Bain : It was your comment that all actions should tick at least
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : I don't know that I'm restricting all actions to this tricho
Read more...

al bain : On what scriptural basis are you restricting all actions to
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : How are these, for definitions... Work = Activities for b
Read more...

KIM : i second the recommendation for communicate jesus -- and can
Read more...

Gary Ware : That hollow feeling in the pit of your gut when the fact you
Read more...

Anika Q : Rather off topic, but I found out today that there is a semi
Read more...


About St. Eutychus

Eutychus was a young man who fell to his death because the Apostle Paul preached for too long (Acts 20). I've decided to canonise Eutychus and make him the patron saint of my dalliances around the Internet.

About Nathan

Nathan is a Christian.
A husband.
A student. A writer.
A reader.
A coffee drinker.
A “spin twit”.
A consumer.
A fan of stupid gadgets.
A fan of staccato lists in profiles.

Archives

Translate

Subscribe Link

Why Subscribe?
Subscribe with Google
Add to Google
Other Readers
original feed Get the XML
These links above subscribe you to a full RSS feed - feel free to pick and choose feeds based on categories.

RSS Consciousness
RSS Curiosities
RSS Communication
RSS Culture
RSS Christianity
RSS College
RSS Sport
RSS Coffee


Me around the web


Check out my photos on Picasa or Flickr
Watch my videos on YouTube
Read my Google Reader Shared Items
Follow me on Twitter.
Connect on LinkedIn
Friend me on Facebook
Email nm(dot)campbell(at)
gmail(dot)com

Become a "fan"


This is not so much an ego trip as a way for me to have some idea who is out there. Sign up if you don't like commenting.

Recent Comments

Jeff K : I ask people how their Bible reading is going if I get into an awkward convo at church. works a treat.
Read more...

KIM : *like* or am i not supposed to put words in stars?? i like it anyway!
Read more...

Ben McLaughlin : Heh! That's cool that they were such good sports about it.
Read more...

Al Bain : It was your comment that all actions should tick at least one that got me wondering. I think the three categories we have been talking about are helpful. And probably the easiest way to thi
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : I don't know that I'm restricting all actions to this trichotomy - because I think "worship" is probably another element that could be added to the Venn diagram (that would overlap heavily with the ot
Read more...

al bain : On what scriptural basis are you restricting all actions to this trichotomy?
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : How are these, for definitions... Work = Activities for bringing order. Rest = Activities for rejuvenation. Play = Activities for pleasure. I still think the best actions tick two or more of
Read more...

KIM : i second the recommendation for communicate jesus -- and can vouch that its blogger is just as adept at real life interaction as he is at facebook!
Read more...

Gary Ware : That hollow feeling in the pit of your gut when the fact you've been ripped off is really something isn't it? At least it doesn't involve damage to the car, as well. We had our Tarago front quarter w
Read more...

Anika Q : Rather off topic, but I found out today that there is a seminar on the Eutychus passage in Acts in UQ's religious department this Friday at 2. I thought I'd mention it to you, for obvious reasons.
Read more...

Traffic Report

St. Eutychus is running on a WordPress engine. The cool logo in the header was designed by Ben from Vanishing Point. The author doesn't mind what you do with the content - but attribution is always nice. Current images in the post highlight box at the top right come from http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpbp/ / CC BY-SA 2.0 and Wordle.net