Our legal system is built on the presumption of innocence. Things would be pretty messy if we changed things around — we’d have to lock up everybody facing criminal charges — and then who would handle our baggage at the airport or stimulate the economy by buying motorbikes and parts… It’s a central principle of life in a liberal democracy. And yet it is thrown completely out the window in one social occasion — the transaction that takes place when a man buys flowers from any retailer. There’s the same awkward banter between said male and the (generally) female store clerk… Every time. Or at least every time I buy flowers. Maybe I just look guilty. It’s always a variation of this theme:
Salesperson: “So, what have you done wrong?”
As though I would only be buying flowers to atone for wrongdoings. As though a $14 bunch of colourful flora is an appropriate act to win my redemption. It’s presumed guilt. Perhaps I just want points in the bank in case I do something wrong in the future, or maybe my motives are completely altruistic. This response is prejudice at its most banal — and up with this I shall not put. Not any more.
Author: Nathan Campbell

Nathan runs St Eutychus. He is currently a student at the Queensland Theological College. In a previous professional life he worked in public relations for an economic development and tourism marketing organisation. He is married to Robyn. He likes coffee and the internet.
Read Nathan's
3799 articles.
I don’t mean to be pedantic but did you really buy a $14 bunch of colourful fauna? But I agree, there is no presumption of innocence when it comes to buying flowers.
hmm… I’m sure Robyn would really appreciate a bunch of little furry animals… especially colourful ones…
Good point both of you — but now thanks to the power of editing I look smart and you look like geese. Which are fauna.
The comments are closed.