Two questions I want to ask God

I enjoy point­less the­ol­ogy. Ques­tions about stuff that has no real bear­ing on things and that have no easy answers. These are my two ques­tions about spec­u­la­tive the­ol­ogy (and both find their roots in Gen­e­sis but are unre­lated to cre­ation or science).

Who were the Nephilim?

If you’re like me this ques­tion has both­ered you since you were a kid. At one point I resolved that the Nephilim must have been the ori­gins of the Greco-Roman pan­theons. But I’m not really sure.

The Nephilim (sons of God) also pro­vide an inter­est­ing prospect regard­ing sex in the new cre­ation… which Jesus seems to rule out when he’s answer­ing the Phar­isees who are try­ing to trip him up on mar­riage in the New Cre­ation, he says we’ll be like the sons of God — who in Gen­e­sis 6 saw that the daugh­ters of men were beau­ti­ful and they had chil­dren with them…

Some peo­ple think the Nephilim were just the last of the Nean­derthals… which sounds like a Daniel Day-Lewis movie.

It seems every­one has a the­ory on these from the plau­si­ble (that they were just big headed over­achiev­ers whose arro­gance led peo­ple astray) to the wacky (nean­derthals or one of the many groups of peo­ple the Torah books not included in the canon teach about).

I don’t know. But it’s fun.

Who was/is Melchizedek

This is the other curly one — where­fore and why­fore comes this priestly king with his cameo — and it’s clearly sig­nif­i­cant because he’s a pre­cur­sor to the kingly/priestly Jesus — and who­fore is this king? Is he an incar­na­tion of the pre-incarnate Christ? Is he just a God fear­ing king from a city with a sim­i­lar name to Jerusalem — which does not yet exist. Is he a time trav­el­ling budy of Doc from Back to the Future? Share your opin­ions on these mat­ters — or the ques­tions you want to ask God, in the com­ments. Do it. You know you want to.

  1. 1

    What makes grav­ity work? — assum­ing He hasn’t let any­one in on the secret before then.

    Can I sign up for inter­stel­lar explo­ration in the new creation?


  2. 2

    I’m with Mark on the grav­ity ques­tion. I was think­ing about that just the other day. Yes, we know grav­ity is the larger body, such as Earth, pulling smaller bod­ies towards it. But whyyyyyyyyy?


  3. 3

    Per­haps “in him all things hold together” Col 1:17b :p


St. Eutychus does not believe in spam. Your email address will be kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account this field will be used to display your avatar. St. Eutychus will not sell your data to spammers or scammers. We promise.

Plug your blog. I know that's why you're commenting...

St. Eutychus does not believe in long winded comment policies or heavy handed moderation. So:
  • Keep it civil.
  • Keep it clean.
  • Play the ball, not the man.
  • Don't break any defamation laws.


Allowed tags: <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

wayne : For Al: is it possible that when work becomes so opulent as
Read more...

wayne : Gardening is not rest or play, it's work. This fits with the
Read more...

Gary Ware : Still preferring the visual symbols that Jesus gave us. Bap
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : You need to read up on learning styles. My approach to c
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : Oh, and Wayne, I think the category "job for which I ear
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : *nods* I get it. But you didn't need a Venn diagram to sa
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : The purpose was essentially to express how I diverge from Al
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Completely irrelevant to the actual topic of the post, I jus
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Hey all, Firstly, Nath, what's the purpose of this diagra
Read more...

Gary Ware : Watched Gruen on Wednesday night. The comments about the ch
Read more...


About St. Eutychus

Eutychus was a young man who fell to his death because the Apostle Paul preached for too long (Acts 20). I've decided to canonise Eutychus and make him the patron saint of my dalliances around the Internet.

About Nathan

Nathan is a Christian.
A husband.
A student. A writer.
A reader.
A coffee drinker.
A “spin twit”.
A consumer.
A fan of stupid gadgets.
A fan of staccato lists in profiles.

Archives

Translate

Subscribe Link

Why Subscribe?
Subscribe with Google
Add to Google
Other Readers
original feed Get the XML
These links above subscribe you to a full RSS feed - feel free to pick and choose feeds based on categories.

RSS Consciousness
RSS Curiosities
RSS Communication
RSS Culture
RSS Christianity
RSS College
RSS Sport
RSS Coffee


Me around the web


Check out my photos on Picasa or Flickr
Watch my videos on YouTube
Read my Google Reader Shared Items
Follow me on Twitter.
Connect on LinkedIn
Friend me on Facebook
Email nm(dot)campbell(at)
gmail(dot)com

Become a "fan"


This is not so much an ego trip as a way for me to have some idea who is out there. Sign up if you don't like commenting.

Recent Comments

wayne : For Al: is it possible that when work becomes so opulent as to be clearly non-utilitarian, it can be play. For example I took 8 hours to cook a V8 vanilla cake with $60 worth of vanilla beans in it.
Read more...

wayne : Gardening is not rest or play, it's work. This fits with the bible. In Eden, pre fall, gardening is work. I do gardening on my day off. It's enjoyable, it's refreshing, but it's work. It's just a
Read more...

Gary Ware : Still preferring the visual symbols that Jesus gave us. Baptism is a sign and seal of our incorporation into the kingdom, and the supper is a sign and seal of the life by which we live in the kingdom
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : You need to read up on learning styles. My approach to communication is never just a question of the barest minimum I need in order to communicate this to Pete. That would be very boring. Just one
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : Oh, and Wayne, I think the category "job for which I earn money" should stay in the work part of the diagram that doesn't overlap with the others. But I think it's ok to "rest" by doing something
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : *nods* I get it. But you didn't need a Venn diagram to say that. :P
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : The purpose was essentially to express how I diverge from Al's definition of play (that it must have no utility in order to be "play") in a form that is helpful for visual thinkers. I also wanted
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Completely irrelevant to the actual topic of the post, I just wanted to register my agreement with the aforementioned statement regarding the awesomeness of Mika. Kutz
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Hey all, Firstly, Nath, what's the purpose of this diagram? What does it help you to do or understand? I must admit in my thickness to not 'getting it'. Your main thesis seems to be "the mor
Read more...

Gary Ware : Watched Gruen on Wednesday night. The comments about the church had some useful insight. 'The product is good, but the shop-fronts keep letting it down.' Todd Sampson's comment about Hillsong was
Read more...

Traffic Report

St. Eutychus is running on a WordPress engine. The cool logo in the header was designed by Ben from Vanishing Point. The author doesn't mind what you do with the content - but attribution is always nice. Current images in the post highlight box at the top right come from http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpbp/ / CC BY-SA 2.0 and Wordle.net