Biblical Theology 101: Goldsworthy's Kingdom Model and the Old Testament

One of the most famous archi­tects of Bib­li­cal The­ol­ogy is Aus­tralian. Graeme Goldswor­thy. His Gospel and King­dom is one of the sem­i­nal works on Bib­li­cal the­ol­ogy — its premise is that “God’s King­dom” is a lens through which the Bible can be cohe­sively under­stood — he defines God’s king­dom as “God’s peo­ple, liv­ing in God’s place, under God’s Rule”… So, in say the Gar­den of Eden we see God’s peo­ple (Adam and Eve), liv­ing in God’s place (Eden), in direct rela­tion­ship with God, and then, mov­ing for­ward a few books, in Judges we see God’s peo­ple (Israel), liv­ing in God’s place (the promised land), under God’s rule (the judges) — this idea devel­ops through­out the Old Tes­ta­ment, bib­li­cally cul­mi­nat­ing in Jesus, and ulti­mately cul­mi­nat­ing in the new cre­ation. This “redemp­tive his­tory” approach frames every pas­sage as it relates to the ulti­mate end of the Bible, books are not ends in them­selves, but part of the means to that ulti­mate end.

His book “Accord­ing to Plan” charts the devel­op­ment of this pic­ture through the Bible. For our OT exam we’re focus­ing on the Old Tes­ta­ment up to the end of 2 Samuel, so here are his divi­sions of our text under his head­ings (fol­lowed by a summary):

Cre­ation by Word Gen­e­sis 1 and 2
The Fall Gen­e­sis 3
First Rev­e­la­tion of Redemption Gen­e­sis 4–11
Abra­ham Our Father Gen­e­sis 12–50
Exo­dus: Our Pat­tern of Redemption Exo­dus 1–15
New Life: Gift and Task Exo­dus 16–40; Leviticus
The Temp­ta­tion in the Wilderness Num­bers; Deuteronomy
Into the Good Land Joshua; Judges; Ruth
God’s Rule in God’s Land 1 and 2 Samuel; 1 Kings 1–10; 1 Chron­i­cles; 2 Chron­i­cles 1–9

I think the strength of bas­ing approaches to Bib­li­cal texts in a frame­work of Bib­li­cal The­ol­ogy is that it is, by my reck­on­ing, what Jesus would do (and indeed what he did), and it’s cer­tainly what the apos­tles did — they were able to explain, begin­ning with Moses, how Jesus was the ful­fill­ment of the Bib­li­cal nar­ra­tive (cf Matthew 5:17–20). It’s not rocket sci­ence. So a good frame­work, or under­stand­ing of the unfold­ing nature of rev­e­la­tion, helps us read the Old Tes­ta­ment with­out get­ting bogged down in mechan­ics. To con­tinue Vos’ body anal­ogy — we can enjoy the fruits of anatom­i­cal research with­out know­ing the sci­ence — we can sit in our arm chairs and appre­ci­ate ath­letic endeav­our with­out analysing every aspect of the phys­i­o­log­i­cal make up of the ath­lete and his trap­pings, and any study of the mechan­ics should be under­taken with the goal of improv­ing on field performance.

For the ben­e­fit of other Old Tes­ta­ment stu­dents out there — below is Goldsworthy’s sum­mary of the key points in his struc­ture (via here).

Cre­ation by Word
Gen­e­sis 1 and 2
In the begin­ning God cre­ated every­thing that exists. He made Adam and Eve and placed them in the gar­den of Eden. God spoke to them and gave them cer­tain tasks in the world. For food he allowed them the fruit of all the trees in the gar­den except one. He warned them that they would die if they ate of that one tree.

The Fall
Gen­e­sis 3
The snake per­suaded Eve to dis­obey God and to eat the for­bid­den fruit. She gave some to Adam and he ate also. Then God spoke to them in judg­ment, and sent them out of the gar­den into a world that came under the same judgment.

First Rev­e­la­tion of Redemp­tion
Gen­e­sis 4–11
Out­side Eden, Cain and Abel were born to Adam and eve. Cain mur­dered Abel and Eve bore another son, Seth. Even­tu­ally the human race became so wicked that God deter­mined to destroy every liv­ing thing with a flood. Noah and his fam­ily were saved by build­ing a great boat at God’s com­mand. The human race began again with Noah and his three sons with their fam­i­lies. Some­time after the flood a still uni­fied human race attempted a god­less act to assert its power in the build­ing of a high tower. God thwarted these plans by scat­ter­ing the peo­ple and con­fus­ing their language.

Abra­ham Our Father
Gen­e­sis 12–50
Some­time in the early sec­ond mil­len­nium BC God called Abra­ham out of Mesopotamia to Canaan. He promised to give this land to Abraham’s descen­dants and to bless them as his peo­ple. Abra­ham went, and many years later he had a son, Isaac. Isaac in rum had two sons, Esau and Jacob. The promises of God were estab­lished with Jacob and his descen­dants. He had twelve sons, and in time they all went to live in Egypt because of famine in Canaan.

Exo­dus: Our Pat­tern of Redemp­tion
Exo­dus 1–15
In time the descen­dants of Jacob liv­ing in Egypt mul­ti­plied to become a very large num­ber of peo­ple. The Egyp­tians no longer regarded them with friend­li­ness and made them slaves. God appointed Moses to be the one who would lead Israel out of Egypt to the promised land of Canaan. When the moment came for Moses to demand the free­dom of his peo­ple, the Pharaoh refused to let them go. Though Moses worked ten miracle–plagues which brought hard­ship, destruc­tion, and death to the Egyp­tians. Finally, Pharaoh let Israel go, but then pur­sued them and trapped them at the Red Sea (or Sea of Reeds). The God opened a way in the sea for Israel to cross on dry land, but closed the water over the Egypt­ian army, destroy­ing it.

New Life: Gift and Task
Exo­dus 16–40; Leviti­cus
After their release from Egypt, Moses led the Israelites to Mount Sinai. There God gave them his law which they were com­manded to keep. At one point Moses held a covenant renewal cer­e­mony in which the covenant arrange­ment was sealed in blood. How­ever, while Moses was away on the moun­tain, the peo­ple per­suaded Aaron to fash­ion a golden calf. Thus they showed their incli­na­tion to for­sake the covenant and to engage in idol­a­try. God also com­manded the build­ing of the taber­na­cle and gave all the rules of sac­ri­fi­cial wor­ship by which Israel might approach him.

The Temp­ta­tion in the Wilder­ness
Num­bers; Deuteron­omy
After giv­ing the law to the Israelites at Sinai, God directed them to go in and take pos­ses­sion of the promised land. Fear­ing the inhab­i­tants of Canaan, they refused to do so, thus show­ing lack of con­fi­dence in the promises of God. The whole adult gen­er­a­tion that had come out of Egypt, with the excep­tion of Joshua and Caleb, was con­demned to wan­der and die in the desert. Israel was for­bid­den to dis­pos­sess its kins­folk, the nation of Edom, Moab, and Ammon, but was given vic­tory over other nations that opposed it. Finally, forty years after leav­ing Egypt, Israel arrived in the Moabite ter­ri­tory on the east side of the Jor­dan. Here Moses pre­pared the peo­ple for their pos­ses­sion of Canaan, and com­mis­sioned Joshua as their new leader.

Into the Good Land
Joshua; Judges; Ruth
Under Joshua’s lead­er­ship the Israelites crossed the Jor­dan and began the task of dri­ving out the inhab­i­tants of Canaan. After the con­quest the land was divided between the tribes, each being allot­ted its own region. Only the tribe of Levi was with­out an inher­i­tance of land because of its spe­cial priestly rela­tion­ship to God. There remained pock­ets of Canaan­ites in the land and, from time to time, these threat­ened Israel’s hold on their new pos­ses­sion. From the one–man lead­er­ships of Moses and Joshua, the nation moved into a period of rel­a­tive insta­bil­ity dur­ing which judges exer­cised some mea­sure of con­trol over the affairs of the people.

God’s Rule in God’s Land
1 and 2 Samuel; 1 Kings 1–10; 1 Chron­i­cles; 2 Chron­i­cles 1–9
Samuel became judge and prophet in all Israel at a time when the Philistines threat­ened the free­dom of the nation. An ear­lier move­ment for king­ship was received and the demand put to a reluc­tant Samuel. The first king, Saul, had a promis­ing start to his reign but even­tu­ally showed him­self unsuit­able as the ruler of the covenant peo­ple. While Saul still reigned, David was anointed to suc­ceed him. Because of Saul’s jeal­ousy David became an out­cast, but when Saul died in bat­tle David returned and became king (about 1000 BC). Due to his suc­cess Israel became a pow­er­ful and sta­ble nation. He estab­lished a cen­tral sanc­tu­ary at Jerusalem, and cre­ated a pro­fes­sional bureau­cracy and per­ma­nent army. David’s son Solomon suc­ceeded him (about 961 BC) and the pros­per­ity of Israel con­tin­ued. The build­ing of the tem­ple at Jerusalem was one of Solomon’s most notable achievements.


  1. 1
    Al Bain

    I mined pretty deeply from Dumbrell’s The Faith of Israel.

    Every­one does the Goldswor­thy thing. Read some­thing else as well. Waltke or Bruegge­mann. Goldin­gay is well worth read­ing. So is Paul House.


  2. 2

    An over-reliance on the king­dom schema really skewed my read­ing of the OT. I think the key ques­tion we fail to ask in Syd­ney is, “What’s the link between Gen­e­sis 12:1–3 and Gen­e­sis 1–3?”

    My con­fes­sion and cri­tique are here: http://leslumieres-au.blogspot.com/2009/03/revisiting-goldsworthy.html


  3. 3
    Nathan Campbell

    Thanks guys. I’ve got Dumbrell’s “The Faith of Israel” here, no doubt you’ve seen my sub­se­quent post on covenan­tal the­ol­ogy. Waltke is on the agenda for today. Paul House is com­ing to QTC later this year.

    And thanks for that cri­tique Stu. I thought Trueman’s crit­i­cism (in the last post) was pretty on the money.


  4. 4
    Nathan Campbell

    Also, Scobie’s mul­ti­the­matic approach is more my style. I even went in that direc­tion before I’d read him in an old post on uni­fy­ing ideas that I can’t be both­ered look­ing up to link to…


  5. 5
    Al Bain

    I’ve got Sco­bie but admit to not hav­ing been inspired by him much. Part of the prob­lem is the lay­out of the book which is ter­ri­ble. And no index!! ergh.

    If you want a book that lays out a theme, then I found Strom’s lit­tle num­ber the best.

    But I reckon that just deal­ing with the text with­out any par­tic­u­lar theme in mind is the best way to go. Tip your hat to a few the­matic opin­ions in your essays so the marker knows that you are aware of them, but the OT is so full of ten­sions and appar­ent con­tra­dic­tions that it’s best to leave them unre­solved I reckon.

    Read Eichrodt too. He’s an oldie but a goodie. Not much. Just enough so that your marker knows that you’ve read widely.

    But I really would look at Goldingay.


  6. 6
    Nathan Campbell

    I will take your rec­om­men­da­tions, though prob­a­bly not in time for tomorrow’s exam.

    The ques­tion will be some­thing along the lines of “How is Bib­li­cal The­ol­ogy use­ful for approach­ing the Old Testament?”

    My answer will be some­thing along the lines of:

    1. It grounds us in the notion that the Bible is a uni­fied text not a hodge podge of dis­parate parts strung together because no other doc­u­ments existed.

    2. It puts other forms of lit­er­ary crit­i­cism in their place as sub­sets of this view.

    3. It helps us chart the devel­op­ment of God’s redemp­tive plans for cre­ation from go to woe. Start­ing with cre­ation and the fall, through the cre­ation of his peo­ple with covenant oblig­a­tions, the devel­op­ment of king­ship, and ulti­mately cul­mi­nat­ing with the new cre­ation and Jesus as king.

    4. It reminds us that themes carry on, and develop through the Bib­li­cal text that are help­ful for guid­ing our exe­ge­sis and our preaching.

    None of the ideas put for­ward as uni­fy­ing con­cepts for the Bible are entirely sat­is­fy­ing on their own, they all miss some­thing of the com­plex­ity of the text (any sim­pli­fi­ca­tion or sum­mary will inher­ently do that), but they all play a role in shap­ing our inter­pre­ta­tion. Point­ing out link­ing themes is use­ful. Pro­vided you don’t want to turn it into the only thread that holds the Bible together.


  7. 7
    Nathan Campbell

    5. It’s also a good cor­rec­tive of fun­da­men­tal­ism — that pays no regard to lit­er­ary con­text or any devel­op­ment of themes, but rather approaches the text as one dimensional.


  8. 8
    Al Bain

    I hope it goes well.


St. Eutychus does not believe in spam. Your email address will be kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account this field will be used to display your avatar. St. Eutychus will not sell your data to spammers or scammers. We promise.

Plug your blog. I know that's why you're commenting...

St. Eutychus does not believe in long winded comment policies or heavy handed moderation. So:
  • Keep it civil.
  • Keep it clean.
  • Play the ball, not the man.
  • Don't break any defamation laws.


Allowed tags: <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

wayne : For Al: is it possible that when work becomes so opulent as
Read more...

wayne : Gardening is not rest or play, it's work. This fits with the
Read more...

Gary Ware : Still preferring the visual symbols that Jesus gave us. Bap
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : You need to read up on learning styles. My approach to c
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : Oh, and Wayne, I think the category "job for which I ear
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : *nods* I get it. But you didn't need a Venn diagram to sa
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : The purpose was essentially to express how I diverge from Al
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Completely irrelevant to the actual topic of the post, I jus
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Hey all, Firstly, Nath, what's the purpose of this diagra
Read more...

Gary Ware : Watched Gruen on Wednesday night. The comments about the ch
Read more...


About St. Eutychus

Eutychus was a young man who fell to his death because the Apostle Paul preached for too long (Acts 20). I've decided to canonise Eutychus and make him the patron saint of my dalliances around the Internet.

About Nathan

Nathan is a Christian.
A husband.
A student. A writer.
A reader.
A coffee drinker.
A “spin twit”.
A consumer.
A fan of stupid gadgets.
A fan of staccato lists in profiles.

Archives

Translate

Subscribe Link

Why Subscribe?
Subscribe with Google
Add to Google
Other Readers
original feed Get the XML
These links above subscribe you to a full RSS feed - feel free to pick and choose feeds based on categories.

RSS Consciousness
RSS Curiosities
RSS Communication
RSS Culture
RSS Christianity
RSS College
RSS Sport
RSS Coffee


Me around the web


Check out my photos on Picasa or Flickr
Watch my videos on YouTube
Read my Google Reader Shared Items
Follow me on Twitter.
Connect on LinkedIn
Friend me on Facebook
Email nm(dot)campbell(at)
gmail(dot)com

Become a "fan"


This is not so much an ego trip as a way for me to have some idea who is out there. Sign up if you don't like commenting.

Recent Comments

wayne : For Al: is it possible that when work becomes so opulent as to be clearly non-utilitarian, it can be play. For example I took 8 hours to cook a V8 vanilla cake with $60 worth of vanilla beans in it.
Read more...

wayne : Gardening is not rest or play, it's work. This fits with the bible. In Eden, pre fall, gardening is work. I do gardening on my day off. It's enjoyable, it's refreshing, but it's work. It's just a
Read more...

Gary Ware : Still preferring the visual symbols that Jesus gave us. Baptism is a sign and seal of our incorporation into the kingdom, and the supper is a sign and seal of the life by which we live in the kingdom
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : You need to read up on learning styles. My approach to communication is never just a question of the barest minimum I need in order to communicate this to Pete. That would be very boring. Just one
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : Oh, and Wayne, I think the category "job for which I earn money" should stay in the work part of the diagram that doesn't overlap with the others. But I think it's ok to "rest" by doing something
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : *nods* I get it. But you didn't need a Venn diagram to say that. :P
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : The purpose was essentially to express how I diverge from Al's definition of play (that it must have no utility in order to be "play") in a form that is helpful for visual thinkers. I also wanted
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Completely irrelevant to the actual topic of the post, I just wanted to register my agreement with the aforementioned statement regarding the awesomeness of Mika. Kutz
Read more...

Pete Kutuzov (Kutz) : Hey all, Firstly, Nath, what's the purpose of this diagram? What does it help you to do or understand? I must admit in my thickness to not 'getting it'. Your main thesis seems to be "the mor
Read more...

Gary Ware : Watched Gruen on Wednesday night. The comments about the church had some useful insight. 'The product is good, but the shop-fronts keep letting it down.' Todd Sampson's comment about Hillsong was
Read more...

Traffic Report

St. Eutychus is running on a WordPress engine. The cool logo in the header was designed by Ben from Vanishing Point. The author doesn't mind what you do with the content - but attribution is always nice. Current images in the post highlight box at the top right come from http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpbp/ / CC BY-SA 2.0 and Wordle.net