- Wridea Is an Online Organizer for Your Ideas [Ideas]
- Make Invisible Speakers By Sacrificing Six Books
- RunPee.com Suggests The Best Movie Bathroom Breaks
- 5 Applications for Extreme Time-Saving
- Why are paleontologists always finding the “missing link”?
- Wolfram Alpha Google Adds Computational Answers To Google Results
- Typewriter Forces You To Focus While You Write
- Chartle.net Creates Venn Diagrams, Interactive Maps And More
- Google Chrome 2 Brings New Features and Serious Speed [Downloads]
- Christendom, Not Christianity, Is Declining
- Atheist says, read the New Testament!
- Preaching in Brisvegas
A bunch of links – May 22, 2009
Creatures of the swamp

My employer has committed to raising funds to save an iconic North Queensland wetland. Until recently I thought wetland meant swamp. I was apparently mistaken.
I went there yesterday with some film crews. And took some photos. Check them out here… or if you’re too lazy, here are some highlights…




Operator… Get me Sweden
That’s the name of a Darren Hanlon song – and after a bit of news today I feel like picking up the phone and saying just that.
I like Sweden. And I like the Swedish. But this is ridiculous…
“Swedish women will be permitted to abort their children based on the sex of the fetus, according to a ruling by Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare.”
According to this article.
Nasty.
I’ve run out of atheism headings
It seems to me that any time Christians (or theists) are critical of the nasty side of atheism we get shouted down as hypocrites. How can we pick on Dawkins, for how can we caricature them all on account of his vitriol when we had George W Bush as the public face of Christianity justifying unpopular wars with terribly out of context Bible passages? Or indeed or the televangelists et al who are a public bastardisation of the Christian message.
Is this a log v speck issue? Should we be trying to clear up the Christian brand (ie what the public think Christianity is) before we go charging at the bastion of angry atheism – namely Richard Dawkins and co.
Probably. Those loony fringes of Christianity are much better at garnering publicity than the mainstream evangelical orthodoxy. Like the woman in the US who kidnapped her kid because he has cancer and the State wanted to force him to undergo life saving medical treatment.
So long as that’s the public understanding of “Christianity” pushed by the media we’re going to have troubles criticising atheism because the public understanding of atheism is angry intellectual criticism of religious belief.
I actually started writing this post because there’s been a pretty angry response to that article in the LA Times the other day – and I wanted to talk about how angry atheists are, and how Dawkins seems to epitomise atheism, rather than being at its fringe.
That is all. For now.
According to google
It occurs to me that introducing any piece of communication with “if you google…” or “according to google…” – it’s as big a no-no as introducing anything by saying “the Oxford English Dictionary defines… as…”.
If you don’t know why this is a problematic way to enter dialogue (or indeed a monologue) – then please, begin your comment with either a dictionary definition or a reference to google search results on the matter.
Little trophy of bunny homicide

Little sister number 2 also suggested I post this. Again, from etsy, another piece of macabre crochet work.
Ninja Checkers
When your little sister (number 2), who is topping her course at uni (Business) tells you to do something. You do it. Because you know it’s good business. She wants me to post this Ninja Checkers Set from Etsy.

So I did. Also, it’s got ninjas. So it’s pretty much natural blog fodder round these parts anyway.
Cross promotions
Wil Anderson just made this bold claim on the Gruen Transfer:
“The McDonalds Golden Arches are now more recognisable than the Christian Cross.”
True or false?
It kind of fails to take into account the historical brand recognition and needs to be more specifically defined.
A little bit of googling suggests that this was either a piece of corporate indoctrination fostered by McDonalds that has now become fact – or that there is an obscure survey that I can’t find from the late 90s conducted in Australia…
Your thoughts?
A bunch of links – May 20, 2009
- NES Punch-Out Controller Will Actually Make You Sweat
- 11 Striking Findings From an Eye Tracking Study
- What you can do with a music degree
- 5 Useful Uses for Wolfram Alpha
- Make Your Refrigerator Far More Efficient
- McDonald in, Symonds out of Ashes squad
- t-rex is wrong: a google search for “He’s an A+ number one writer dude” returns zero results, with or without references to shakespeare. UNTIL NOW
- Re: A Question About Preaching by Michael Mckinley
- RE: RE: A Question About Preaching by Thabiti Anyabwile
- Rugby League Sex Scandal and the Moral Zeitgeist
- twilight
- Hip Hop Star Murdered Just Two Hours After His First Tweets
- Is atheism reason-able?
- #543. Throwing out disclaimers before you recommend something secular.
Quiet enough
I did have some serious reflections from men’s camp on the weekend that I thought were worth formulating into some sort of post – but it’s probably a bigger deal than just a “men’s camp reflection”. A while back I wrote about praying in church – I promised at that stage that I’d have a go at more “sacred cows”… and when it comes to Evangelical Christianity I don’t think there’s anything more sacred than the Quiet Time. And I don’t know why.
There are reasons. Good reasons, at least I think they are. So here we go.
- Quiet Times feel too much like “self development” to me – they’re, by their very nature – self focused. They don’t, in and of themselves, serve others. They primarily serve the doer. I understand the argument that disciplined time spent in God’s word and in prayer will help you love and serve others more – I just think that given the choice – I would always choose to spend my quiet time with someone else – either a fellow Christian for encouragement, or a non-Christian proclaiming Christ – what good reason is there to spend time by yourself?
- I’m naturally an extrovert – I find other people stimulating, I learn through engaging in conversation, I do my best thinking while talking. I don’t think I’m unique. So for me, and this is where men’s camp comes in, wandering off into tranquil open spaces does nothing for me. I sit there resenting the fact that I can’t chew over the material with somebody, and if I’ve got a notepad I make angry notes about the fact that I don’t think this “self reflection” time is spiritually valuable.
- The Biblical model of Christian life is communal. It’s relational. That’s the model of ministry demonstrated by Jesus, and then by the Apostles and the leaders of the early church. Why is our focus on the individual? I’d say that’s cultural rather than Biblical – and is a child of a self-focused personal development philosophy. I might be wrong. But I’ll need some convincing.
- While knowing the Bible and prayer are important – doing both is not consistent with any Biblical passages I can find – even when Jesus wanted to escape the crowds for some “solitude” he took his disciples with him in most cases. Not, I acknowledge, in the Garden of Gethsemane – but even then he had his closest friends nearby. Can anybody point me to anything that encourages disciplined “personal devotion”? I haven’t found anything yet that suggests my theory is flawed. But again, I’m open to discussion on this point.
- I can see a place for solitude as “rest” from other people. But again, I would see this as an allowable exception rather than the general rule.
What do you think?
Overclocking
You know you’ve taken your clock concept too far when it needs 12 other clocks to form the clockface.
But that’s what Humans since 1982 have done. And it kind of works… if you like clocks that go a conceptual step too far.

More than meets the eye
This is a nice USB drive/Transformers tie in. I would like one, but they’re $42 – which works out at $21 a GB.

YouTube Twosday: More animal coffee
No, not the stuff that’s been through the digestive tract… but latte art featuring friendly mythical animals… and pigs.










