He’s not the Messiah, according to the "religious right"

I promise not to dwell on the US election for much longer. I keep finding new and interesting (to me) material as the pundits continue to dissect the results. There's a serious paucity of real political news to report now that the election is done and dusted. We've got two months left of George W Bush – but diplomatic gaff stories (and associated snubbings of antipodan PMs) will only entertain for so long. There is the ongoing selection of Obama's cabinet to occupy interested observers. But when all is said and done, the most interesting thing for political commentators to do is pull apart the reason for Obama's crushing victory – and in some cases the reasons certain areas bucked the trend. 

This particular finding may shock you. Evangelical Christians didn't take a shine to Obama . Funnily enough – where the evangelical population was most concentrated was where McCain did best. Who'd have thunk it? These are the voters who were the core of support for George W Bush. Who'd have thought arch conservatives wouldn't like Obama. I find it odd that I liked him so much given my own typical social conservatism. And evangelical beliefs. But then, I'm not an American and Americans (particularly the Christians) have this odd view that puts America at the heart of God's kingdom – and the President as a pseudo pope – their representative of God's kingdom. I don't understand a system of democracy where an individual's faith comes ahead of their ability to govern when they're leading a secular organisation (ie the government). By all means, appoint church leaders on the basis of their doctrine and teaching – as is biblical – but officials should be elected on merit.  

2 thoughts on “He’s not the Messiah, according to the "religious right"”

  1. Officials should be elected based on what they are going to do for their country.

    For those of a particular faith, their faith will (or should) govern those decisions.

    Obama’s faith aside, he proposed several law changes very unpopular with Christians.

    Of COURSE the religious right wouldn’t like him.

  2. My point was that the religious right pretty much doesn’t ever vote for the Democrats – as the Democrats sit on the Left wing. The Religious Right are called that because they’re the religious right wing. There was never a chance that they’d vote for Obama. The story was dumb. It wasn’t anything groundbreaking.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top