On for young and old

I sub­scribe to Dinosaur Comics. I read them most days. I find them vaguely amus­ing about 60% of the time and laugh out loud amus­ing about 2% of the time.

Today’s comic, and the asso­ci­ated dia­tribe about the way old peo­ple han­dle sto­ries about young peo­ple and tech­nol­ogy made me laugh. The story it’s respond­ing to is this one about a young guy who used an updated Face­book sta­tus as an alibi. You can’t get that from the comic…

But the asso­ci­ated edi­to­r­ial spells it all out…

But as that arti­cle goes on, it slides deep into “oh man OLD PEOPLE STEREOTYPES” ter­ri­tory. Joseph Pollini, who oth­er­wise sounds awe­some because he lists “hostage nego­ti­a­tion” as his pri­mary area of exper­tise, says that teenage HACKERS could have posted that pancake-centric Face­book update to Rodney’s pro­file while pos­ing as Rod­ney at his home com­puter, while Rod­ney was actu­ally out busy rob­bing at the time — which, you know, is pos­si­ble? But it’s not very likely, and it takes some knowl­edge. No prob­lem, says Joseph! Teenagers are really good at inter­net, because “they use it all the time”. “They [teenagers!] could develop an alibi. They watch tele­vi­sion, the movies, there is a mul­ti­tude of rea­sons why some­one of that age would have the knowl­edge to do a crime like that.”

ABC Radio up here in Townsville has an amus­ing weekly seg­ment with a local lady in her twi­light year (how do you say “old” in a polit­i­cally cor­rect man­ner?). Last night she was talk­ing about kids and their fat thumbs that come from an insa­tiable desire to play the lat­est great­est games.

I think future chil­dren are going to be play­ing the games their fathers give them. The old old gen­er­a­tion miss the point that the new old gen­er­a­tion embrace tech­nol­ogy the same way the new new gen­er­a­tion do. Though I sup­pose there’s a dif­fer­ence between the way even my youngest sis­ter approaches tech­nol­ogy and the way I do.

Mark Driscoll, when he was in Aus­tralia, made a com­ment about faith — one gen­er­a­tion wholly owns it, the next accepts (or assumes) it, and the next denies it. I think tech­nol­ogy works in reverse.

Let us, for a moment, take a look at my fam­ily as a case study…

My dad was a clas­sic early adopter. He was an elec­tri­cal engi­neer which put him at the front of the curve when it came to devel­op­ing com­puter tech­nol­ogy. So far at the front of the curve that he wrote a book about one of the first com­put­ers. This, through a vari­ety of cir­cum­stances detailed in that link, led to a life­time of early adopt­ing. His gen­er­a­tion (and to be kind, the one before it) built the com­puter industry.

This in turn meant that I grew up expe­ri­enc­ing a heap of new com­puter prod­ucts and games. I think I wrote my first assign­ment using the Inter­net (Com­puServe) in 1994. It was about Rwanda. It was, on reflec­tion, pos­si­bly the best assign­ment I ever wrote (except maybe for the self help guide to writ­ing self help books).  I like tech­nol­ogy. I use tech­nol­ogy. I find tech­nol­ogy incred­i­bly use­ful. I think, though this hasn’t really been tested, I could func­tion with­out it.

My gen­er­a­tion ben­e­fited greatly from the work of the gen­er­a­tion pre­vi­ously — and many of us (not me) are now inter­net mil­lion­aires and bil­lion­aires because we missed the first dot com boom and caught the sec­ond. We are also a gen­er­a­tion of hack­ers and pirates who believe tech­nol­ogy should work for us, not us for it.

Mean­while the next gen­er­a­tion down couldn’t really live with­out it. Lets take lit­tle sis­ter num­ber three as an exam­ple. I sus­pect if I stole her mobile phones (that’s right, plural) she’d go into melt­down. She can cor­rect me if I’m wrong.

Her gen­er­a­tion have grown up immersed in tech­nol­ogy — some of them have one mobile phone with a bunch of dif­fer­ent SIM cards based on who they want to call on free deals. They have adopted a new, and very stu­pid lan­guage where words sub­sti­tute num­bers for let­ters and acronyms and ini­tialisms flourish.

I’m friends with some of her friends on Face­book. And they’re all like “OMG, OMG!!! I’d totally die with­out my phone? I totes* need to update my Face­book Sta­tus with every mean­ing­less thought” and “where’s my pan­cakes?”… though that’s sans punc­tu­a­tion includ­ing apos­tro­phes. Because they don’t know how to use them.

Her gen­er­a­tion, well, they write viruses that carry pop­u­lar inter­net pranks onto the phone hand­sets of many of my generation’s geeks. Those peo­ple run­ning around with unlocked iPhones.

I don’t know if there’s a point to this dia­tribe. Except per­haps to high­light how silly it sounds when any gen­er­a­tion talks about the next gen­er­a­tion with­out com­pletely under­stand­ing where they’re com­ing from. Peo­ple older than me didn’t grow up with com­put­ers — though they design the com­put­ers and the soft­ware that I like to play with… To bring in another topic alto­gether, this is like music. Young peo­ple think any­one about ten years older than them must be out of touch with their music and what’s cool — and yet they’re all lis­ten­ing (with the excep­tion of Jonas Broth­ers fans) to music made by peo­ple ten years older than them.

I think it’s sad when peo­ple my age are excited by the prospect of see­ing Brit­ney Spears (who’s two years older than me) in con­cert. Don’t they realise she’s just a vac­u­ous exam­ple of our gen­er­a­tion? Why aren’t they lis­ten­ing to Radio­head or some­one respectable.

The other area this whole gen­er­a­tion gap expresses itself in is fash­ion. I want to know if I’m going to sud­denly start dress­ing like an old per­son — or if what I wear now, or what oth­ers of my gen­er­a­tion wear now, will sud­denly become old per­son cloth­ing at some point. I can’t wait for vin­tage vin­tage T-Shirts to be the cloth­ing of choice for vin­tage peo­ple. As some­one who grew up want­ing to find grandpa shirts in op-shops I sense some sort of irony in peo­ple buy­ing the t-shirts I wear now in op-shops in twenty years. All in a bid to be cool and authentic.

That is all.

*Totes is an actual quote from sev­eral of the next generation’s sta­tuses. It’s a dumb word. It means totally. This is the gen­er­a­tion gap at work people.

  1. 1
    Aaran

    I was antic­i­pat­ing some pro­found state­ment of wis­dom but it never came. I feel ripped off, lists are much bet­ter return on invest­ment for readers.


  2. 2

    Would you believe my mum used to teach com­puter stud­ies out at the uni back in the 80s?? haha.

    Oh, and lol… Andre got rick­rolled :D It was jail­bro­ken iPhones on Sintel-owned net­works, not just Optus as the arti­cle claimed. Optus is owned by Sin­tel, just like other net­works in Asia that were also affected.

    Oh and appar­ently you don’t know how to use apos­tro­phes either… seri­ously, using an apos­tro­phe for a plural?? “I think future chil­dren are going to be play­ing the games their father’s give the.” :P


  3. 3

    *give them.”


  4. 4

    Ahh Leah,

    Rule one for pub­licly cor­rect­ing some­one is don’t make an error yourself.

    Rule two is don’t cor­rect some­one who has edit­ing capa­bil­i­ties when you don’t.


  5. 5
    queenstuss

    I think there is some wis­dom in this. I think it is so impor­tant for us to recog­nise that we pos­sess so much knowl­edge not because we are so much smarter than gen­er­a­tions pre­vi­ous, but rather because we have so much knowl­edge to build on. Great advances in tech­nol­ogy, med­i­cine, and the Arts come because we are advanc­ing on other people’s advances. Imag­ine if every gen­er­a­tion had to work out grav­ity before they could go on to work out how to build a faster plane.


  6. 6
    queenstuss

    I think it’s sad that any­one would be get­ting excited by the prospect of Brit­ney Spears…

    I’m under­stand­ing the whole gen­er­a­tion gap in the fash­ion thing. Last week I was in Tar­get with my sis­ter, who is ten years younger than me, and she picked up a dress that looked iden­ti­cal to some­thing I dressed my Bar­bie in, and then we walked into a sec­tion where I felt like I was in Bar­bie and the Rock­ers wardrobe. If you weren’t a young girl in 1986, that prob­a­bly makes no sense to you, but Bar­bie is always at the epit­ome of fashion.


  7. 7
    queenstuss

    And, if I may, I’d like to say some­thing else.

    My three-year-old can quite con­fi­dently nav­i­gate is way around our iPod touch. He can access the apps we have on there for him, regard­less what is already open at the time. He can also con­fi­dently nav­i­gate Wii Fit, as long as I’ve turned it on for him. When I get my shiny new Mac in the near future, no doubt he will learn to find his way around it much quicker than my hus­band in his late-thirties. Actu­ally, he can nav­i­gate Wii Fit bet­ter than his father.
    This has noth­ing to do with age. It has every­thing to do with how much access the user has to the tech­nol­ogy. Yes, younger peo­ple learn new things bet­ter than older peo­ple do. It has to do with brain devel­op­ment. But if a fifteen-year-old has never used Face­book, but her seventy-year-old grand­mother uses it every day, the grand­mother will be more pro­fi­cient. At least for a lit­tle while.


  8. 8

    I read once about how our par­ents’ and grand­par­ents’ gen­er­a­tions expect a but­ton to do some­thing (i.e. on or off), while we expect it to give us a list of options.


  9. 9

    You know you are get­ting old when you start talk­ing about ‘my gen­er­a­tion’, the ‘younger generation’…


St. Eutychus does not believe in spam. Your email address will be kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account this field will be used to display your avatar. St. Eutychus will not sell your data to spammers or scammers. We promise.

Plug your blog. I know that's why you're commenting...

St. Eutychus does not believe in long winded comment policies or heavy handed moderation. So:
  • Keep it civil.
  • Keep it clean.
  • Play the ball, not the man.
  • Don't break any defamation laws.


Allowed tags: <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

Jeff K : I ask people how their Bible reading is going if I get into
Read more...

KIM : *like* or am i not supposed to put words in stars?? i li
Read more...

Ben McLaughlin : Heh! That's cool that they were such good sports about it.
Read more...

Al Bain : It was your comment that all actions should tick at least
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : I don't know that I'm restricting all actions to this tricho
Read more...

al bain : On what scriptural basis are you restricting all actions to
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : How are these, for definitions... Work = Activities for b
Read more...

KIM : i second the recommendation for communicate jesus -- and can
Read more...

Gary Ware : That hollow feeling in the pit of your gut when the fact you
Read more...

Anika Q : Rather off topic, but I found out today that there is a semi
Read more...


About St. Eutychus

Eutychus was a young man who fell to his death because the Apostle Paul preached for too long (Acts 20). I've decided to canonise Eutychus and make him the patron saint of my dalliances around the Internet.

About Nathan

Nathan is a Christian.
A husband.
A student. A writer.
A reader.
A coffee drinker.
A “spin twit”.
A consumer.
A fan of stupid gadgets.
A fan of staccato lists in profiles.

Archives

Translate

Subscribe Link

Why Subscribe?
Subscribe with Google
Add to Google
Other Readers
original feed Get the XML
These links above subscribe you to a full RSS feed - feel free to pick and choose feeds based on categories.

RSS Consciousness
RSS Curiosities
RSS Communication
RSS Culture
RSS Christianity
RSS College
RSS Sport
RSS Coffee


Me around the web


Check out my photos on Picasa or Flickr
Watch my videos on YouTube
Read my Google Reader Shared Items
Follow me on Twitter.
Connect on LinkedIn
Friend me on Facebook
Email nm(dot)campbell(at)
gmail(dot)com

Become a "fan"


This is not so much an ego trip as a way for me to have some idea who is out there. Sign up if you don't like commenting.

Recent Comments

Jeff K : I ask people how their Bible reading is going if I get into an awkward convo at church. works a treat.
Read more...

KIM : *like* or am i not supposed to put words in stars?? i like it anyway!
Read more...

Ben McLaughlin : Heh! That's cool that they were such good sports about it.
Read more...

Al Bain : It was your comment that all actions should tick at least one that got me wondering. I think the three categories we have been talking about are helpful. And probably the easiest way to thi
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : I don't know that I'm restricting all actions to this trichotomy - because I think "worship" is probably another element that could be added to the Venn diagram (that would overlap heavily with the ot
Read more...

al bain : On what scriptural basis are you restricting all actions to this trichotomy?
Read more...

Nathan Campbell : How are these, for definitions... Work = Activities for bringing order. Rest = Activities for rejuvenation. Play = Activities for pleasure. I still think the best actions tick two or more of
Read more...

KIM : i second the recommendation for communicate jesus -- and can vouch that its blogger is just as adept at real life interaction as he is at facebook!
Read more...

Gary Ware : That hollow feeling in the pit of your gut when the fact you've been ripped off is really something isn't it? At least it doesn't involve damage to the car, as well. We had our Tarago front quarter w
Read more...

Anika Q : Rather off topic, but I found out today that there is a seminar on the Eutychus passage in Acts in UQ's religious department this Friday at 2. I thought I'd mention it to you, for obvious reasons.
Read more...

Traffic Report

St. Eutychus is running on a WordPress engine. The cool logo in the header was designed by Ben from Vanishing Point. The author doesn't mind what you do with the content - but attribution is always nice. Current images in the post highlight box at the top right come from http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpbp/ / CC BY-SA 2.0 and Wordle.net