Category: Culture

Why smart people fail

Apparently there are at least these 20 reasons that smart people fail. If you want to look into why dumb people are overconfident (or the Dunning-Kruger effect),

1. Lack of motivation.
2. Lack of impulse control.
3. Lack of perserverance and perseveration.
4. Using the wrong abilities.
5. Inability to translate thought into action.
6. Lack of product orientation.
7. Inability to complete tasks.
8. Failure to initiate.
9. Fear of failure.
10. Procrastination.
11. Misattribution of blame.
12. Excessive self-pity.
13. Excessive dependency.
14. Wallowing in personal difficulties.
15. Distractibility and lack of concentration.
16. Spreading oneself too think or too thick.
17. Inability to delay gratification.
18. Inability to see the forest for the trees.
19. Lack of balance between critical, analytical thinking and creative, synthetic thinking.
20. Too little or too much self-confidence.

I wonder how many of these factors must be present before intelligence must be questioned.

Harry Potter and the Penguin Classic

M.S Corley, a freelance cover designer, redrew the covers of all the Harry Potter novels as Penguin Classics. They’re pretty cool.

Here are the rest.

Kim Jong Ill with Bieber fever?

Rule One for running competitions online in the 4 Chan era must surely be “though shalt not run competitions that allow unsolicited responses…”

Teen “sensation” Justin Bieber ran a web competition for fans to choose his next tour destination. 4Chan got wind of it. Justin Bieber, if he honours the competition, is now going to North Korea.

The BBC reported the story with unwarranted seriousness.

“Given the fact that almost all citizens of North Korea are denied internet access and there are restrictive controls over all media, it is unlikely that any of the votes have actually come from within the country.”

Really?

Via BoingBoing.

YouTube Tuesday: Lego Arsenal

Jack Streat builds guns. Awesome guns. Made out of Lego. They fire lego bullets. This is what happens when boys don’t stop playing with their toys. There are videos of his guns in working order on YouTube.

Why do birds suddenly appear?

Facebook has extended an invitation to its community looking for “Beta Testers” – your submission requires you to answer a question, any question, as a demonstration of your suitability. I chose “Why do birds suddenly appear?” Here is my answer.


Why do birds suddenly appear?

Birds (Latin, aves*) have habitually, some would say instinctively, appeared in odd places since the beginning of time, though usually at the start of spring, or at the turn of the hour when they are affixed to a spring in a cuckoo clock. This reoccurring natural event prompted some, like Hal David, and Burt Bacharach, to posit suggestions regarding its underlying cause. Their research, popularised in the song (They Long to Be) Close to You, drew largely unsatisfactory conclusions. They suggested that the question “why do birds suddenly appear” finds a natural corollary in the answer “they long to be close to you.” Which begs the question – if a bird hatches in the woods, and there is nobody nearby to be close to, does it really hatch? The answer of course, is yes.

So why do birds suddenly appear? The answer, in this writer’s opinion, lies in the science of egg incubation. Eggs (wikipedia) are not unique to bird species, other species like reptiles, monotremes (the Platypus and the Echidna), and many aquatic species lay eggs. Eggs (Latin, ovum), and the cumulative factors that lead to the emergence of life from within their shelly construct, are the reason that birds “suddenly appear.” These factors include fertilisation, gestation, and incubation.

How to hatch an egg?
First, the egg must be fertilised, going into the mechanisms of the birds and the bees (or in this case the male birds and the female birds) is beyond the scope of this answer – suffice to say two birds of opposite genders must meet for some “hanky panky” which is followed by the production of a fertilised egg.

This egg must then incubate for a period of time sufficient to allow the development of the baby bird therein to gestate and reach a level of maturity whereby the bird will be able to survive outside the warm, gooey confines of the egg. If you are in possession of such an egg you should follow some of these steps.

A case study: Chickens and Eggs
The question of “which came first” in this instance is largely irrelevant and depends greatly on ones philosophical presuppositions about the origin of the universe. We do, based on current observations, know that an egg comes into existence thanks to the prior existence of a chicken to lay it.

In order to bring a living bird into the world from an egg the following steps (source: Backyard Chickens) can be followed:

1. Allocate a period of 21 days for incubation.
2. Buy an incubator.
3. Check eggs after 2 or three days for the presence of embryos (use a bright light) – if the egg contains a cloudy or opaque substance assume it is fertilised – if the egg does not contain such a mass assume it is infertile and cook it. Don’t let a good egg go to waste.
4. Turn the egg three times a day, until 3 days prior to hatching (so until the 18th day). Mark the top and bottom of the egg (maybe with an x and an o) to track where you are up to in the turning process.
5. Maintain a constant temperature between 99 and 103 degrees (farenheit – at celsius you’ll have a boiled egg on your hands).
6. Once hatched leave the chickens in the incubator for up to three days.

An almost word for word guide – which suggests either plagiarism or a common author – can be found here.

Details about the incubation of eggs from other species can be read in this article from the Forest Preserve District of Cook County’s Nature Bulletin.

Conclusion

Birds suddenly appear due to a confluence of factors relating to the science of eggs hatching. Eggs hatch either due to the presence of the mother on the nest, or the careful incubation carried out by those engaged in bird husbandry.

*Style points for Latin?

Why Kevin Rudd failed

Any leader of any country has reached their used-by date when parodies are indistinguishable from the real thing. Once comics have a suitable amount of material it becomes very hard to look at the leader without the parody running through your head. This video, from last year’s Walkley Awards, surely signalled the beginning of the end for K-Rudd.

Sadly, despite the 12th Man’s efforts, Bill Lawry still commentates.

May the best man win…

It’s the stuff B-Grade Hollywood comedies are made of… a comedian frustrated with the political candidates put forward by major parties starts his own protest party. And then wins. Only, it actually happened. In Iceland. In (if you get the Trivial Pursuit question) the northernmost national capital in the world. Reykjavik. Iceland.

“Last month, in the depressed aftermath of the country’s financial collapse, the Best Party emerged as the biggest winner in Reykjavik’s elections, with 34.7 percent of the vote, and Mr. Gnarr — who also promised a classroom of kindergartners he would build a Disneyland at the airport — is now the fourth mayor in four years of a city that is home to more than a third of the island’s 320,000 people.”

“Mr. Gnarr took office last week, hoping to serve out a full, four-year term, and the new government granted free admission to swimming pools for everyone under 18. Its plans include turning Reykjavik, with its plentiful supply of geothermal energy, into a hub for electric cars.”

Here’s the full story.

Dilbert creator Scott Adams on the Apple experience

Scott Adams is pretty brilliant. I’m sure anybody familiar with Dilbert will agree. Here is his description of the iPhone.

Recently I bought something called an iPhone. It drops calls so often that I no longer use it for audio conversations. It’s too frustrating. And unlike my old BlackBerry days, I don’t send e-mail on the iPhone because the on-screen keyboard is, as far as I can tell, an elaborate practical joke. I am, however, willing to respond to incoming text messages a long as they are in the form of yes-no questions and my answer are in the affirmative. In those cases I can simply type “k,” the shorthand for OK, and I have trained my friends and family to accept L, J, O, or comma as meaning the same thing.

And on why you should invest in Apple as a result (from a story featuring his investment principle: buy shares in companies you hate, because you hate them because they’re good).

My point is that I hate Apple. I hate that I irrationally crave their products, I hate their emotional control over my entire family, I hate the time I waste trying to make iTunes work, I hate how they manipulate my desires, I hate their closed systems, I hate Steve Jobs’s black turtlenecks, and I hate that they call their store employees Geniuses which, as far as I can tell, is actually true. My point is that I wish I had bought stock in Apple five years ago when I first started hating them. But I hate them more every day, which is a positive sign for investing, so I’ll probably buy some shares.

How to punish banks for unwarranted fees

This idea is not my own (I’m not sure I should name the person involved), and it involves something google discourages as “click fraud,” but next time you feel like a bank has charged you unreasonable fees call them and tell them that unless they rescind them you’ll go to google, find one of their ads, and click it enough times to double the price of the fee. It’s a modernised version of the old scheme of  sending payments in coins with insufficient postage (where the bank apparently receives a fee to claim their mail).

YouTube Twosday: Beatboxed Mario

I know it’s Wednesday. And months since I posted a YouTube Tuesday video on Tuesday. But check dis out.

Still not as cool as the beatboxing flautist.

YouTube Tuesday: Vuvuzela Concerto

James Morrison, on Santos, Sam and Ed the other night, said the Vuvuzela actually pitches somewhere between a and b flat. Just in case you were wondering… he played a vuvuzelaphone on the night – basically a set of vuvuzela pan-pipes. It was clever. So is this video.

If the Sermon on the Mount was on YouTube

Sermon on the Mount gets the YouTube comment treatment.

Via here.

New PM

It would be somewhat remiss of me not to comment briefly on our new PM. Congratulations to Ms Gillard for making history and all that…

By my reckoning she’s the first “ranga” PM, the first female PM, the first challenger to oust a sitting PM in their first term, the stager of the fastest bloodless coup in history and the PM with the best hairstyle (which I put down to having a hair stylist for a partner).

Surely everybody saw this coming from the moment Rudd and Gillard formed an uneasy relationship as leader and deputy. K-Rudd’s love-hate relationship with the Australian public and the ALP respectively came to an end in a pretty abrupt moment. Labor has form for ousting elected political leaders in favour of party apparatchiks. It’s not uncommon for the party to foist premiers upon the unwilling denizens of our states – and Channel 10 are about to remind us that it’s all to typical of Labor at a Federal level as well – with its docu-drama Hawke. Labor does anything to hold on to power – even sacrificing one of its own, even if its own happens to be the most popular PM ever – who ousted the PM they loathed.

Rudd’s problem was his chalk and cheese relationship with those around him – the voters, who knew him not, loved him. His party, and any members of the opposition who knew him, reserved incredible disdain for the man. In my former role I dealt with pollies and political pundits, I shared a desk briefly with the PMs infamous chief of staff (as he phoned through some interview transcripts). Of all the people I’ve met, and of everything I’ve read, the impression I get is that Rudd operated with a veneer of courtesy which covered over a multitude of flaws and sins. His outbursts of rage – now common knowledge – were apparently typical of his treatment of those in his way. David Marr’s fascinating political obituary shows where he went wrong.

He had to do everything himself. He couldn’t trust and didn’t delegate. He worked his staff ruthlessly. His temper was formidable. The office operated in a strange atmosphere of rush and delay. Everything happened at the last minute, more often than not to suit the next media hit. This didn’t change when he became PM. While he rode high in the polls it hardly mattered. His party accepted Rudd’s demands for near absolute control. Cabinet was reduced to a shadow of itself.

Part of the problem was Rudd’s old ambition to find decent solutions to the nation’s problems. Decency is personal, intuitive, hard to delegate. Marry that to a sense of indispensability that is right off the Richter scale, and you had a recipe for ruin. Once again, Rudd had enemies everywhere.

Rudd is what happens when ruthless efficiency meets the intention to do good things. His motives were pure but his methods were not.

I couldn’t figure out where Abbott was for the first 24 hours of the coup. Had he come out strongly against Labor and the murky backroom operations of the factions and the unions Gillard’s political nose may have been bloodied from the opening moments of her ascension to power, instead, Labor get a bit of a bump in the polls.

The reaction amongst my Facebook friends was interesting – most seem unhappy with the manner in which Rudd was dismissed, happy to see the back of him, and split on the question of whether Gillard’s hair colour or gender was more historic. Having had the chance to see which way most of my friends swing politically in the last few days I’m struck by what a conservative batch they are. Maybe I’ll vote ALP just to be contrarian…

What I can’t understand is Gillard’s appeal. She seems merciless. She’s the most extremely left wing PM we’ve ever had. And she sounds like a character from Kath and Kim.

The Labor PR machine was impressive. Every Labor talking head, from union bosses to exiled former Queensland Premier Peter Beattie (speaking from Wyoming), had their talking points in order. They praised her as a “strong and decisive figure,” “a born leader,” “an excellent communicator,” and the person who would get Labor’s focus back on the big issues. And each person mentioned the same issues. This was all impressively “on message.”

Possibly my favourite part of the post-coup coverage was Crikey’s collection of photoshopped versions of Julia Gillard (henceforth J-Gill) in the situations she said were more likely than her challenging K-Rudd.
100624_julia_leader1

100624_julia_leader2

100624_julia_leader3_2

100624_julia_leader4_2

YouTube Tuesday: Fellowship of the bvvvrrrrrrr

This is the latest YouTube Tuesday ever… “bvvvrrrr” is the noise I reckon the Vuvuzela makes. It has no vowels. This video is funny.

Via Tim’s blog.

Separated at Birth: the World Cup game, and Steven Seagal

The World Cup has been producing ample fodder for one of my favourite games (which is probably pretty frustrating for other people) I like to call it “hey that guy looks like…”

Here’s an example. The Dutch manager Bert Van Marwijk looks almost exactly like former WWE wrestler Ric Flair…




In unrelated television – Master Chef regular Neil Perry looks exactly like Steven Seagal.

Especially when the latter plays a chef in Under Siege:

Here are Neil Perry’s knife skills on display (in text form) from a Q&A on taste.com.au:


“I love the way you cook and no matter how I try I can’t chop herbs fast or very fine without cutting my fingers. Can you give me some tips on how to chop as well as you do?”

The main thing to remember is to use a slicing action with your knife as opposed to a chopping action. By this, I mean keep the tip of the knife firmly glued to the board and cut/slice in flowing movements. Also, keep your finger tips tucked out of the way at all times. Use the middle knuckle of your fingers as a guide for your knife to lean against and make sure that any part of your fingers below that knuckle are tucked in.

And here, for your viewing pleasure (though it’s probably M rated) are Steven Seagal’s knife skills on display.

And, in a bizarre twist, St-Eutychus has a world exclusive linking the two men, and perhaps establishing that they are in fact the same person…

Neil Perry is the leading Australian endorser of a Japanese brand of knives called Shun knives. Shun knives are made by the Kai Corporation, who in America trade as Kershaw Knives, who just happen to be the manufacturers of the knife Steven Seagal designed.

That’s right. Same knife company. Same hairstyle. Same face. Same Asian flavour. Same person… you be the judge…

Do you have any World Cup lookalikes for me?